Re: Summary: Which Linux distribution is stable yet up-to-date

Gilboa Davara <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.region.israel
Message-ID <CAGw18xKV_4i27_-fLV19+iXE-M8ET748CpE2Tf_4GCWfDb-iEQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Omer Zak <w1-W6cp89mEpD1mR6Xm/[email protected]> wrote:
> Yesterday I posted my question about selecting a Linux distribution to
> serve as the host Linux distribution for a system which runs Docker and
> a virtualization system.
>
> For such a system, I'll want to use a stable but up-to-date kernel.
>
> Unstable distributions will be operated inside a virtual machine or a
> Docker container, as needed.
>
> Several people responded with suggestions.
>

Let me chine in.
My company uses Fedora across the board, from netbook, laptop,
desktops, workstations to mid-end (1S/2S) and high-end (4S) servers
and countless VMs.
We also use Fedora in production servers (we require bleeding edge stack(s).
(All in all, >40 machines)

If you can live with the 13 month support cycle, Fedora can be rock solid.

- Gilboa

_______________________________________________
Linux-il mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.