Re: installed size broken ?

seth vidal <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.rpm.metadata
Message-ID <1225253347.21485.20.camel@rosebud>
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 10:54 +0200, Anders F Björklund wrote:
> seth vidal wrote:
> 
> >>> All the generated repodata for Fedora 9 seems
> >>> to have the same problem as well, afaict...
> >>>
> >>> The repodata for Fedora 8 seems not affected,
> >>> probably it was using the previous createrepo.
> >>>
> >>
> >> This looks like a bug. :)
> >>
> >> I'll take a look and see what I broke.
> >>
> >
> > nothing really broken but a property needed to be lambda'd inside
> > YumHeaderPackage
> 
> So it was not broken, it's just did the wrong thing ? :-)
> I know that Yum doesn't use that "installed" size anyway.
> 
> > it's patched in upstream yum and yum 3.2.20 will have the fix.
> 
> Good to hear it is fixed, and hope that the old repodata
> for Fedora 9 etc. can be regenerated with a backport... ?
> 

backport will wait until it sees some testing in rawhide.

-sv

_______________________________________________
Rpm-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-metadata
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.