Re: -s/--checksum deprecated

Axel Thimm <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.rpm.metadata
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 03:08:31PM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Axel Thimm wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> createrepo 0.9.7 has the options to change the checksum type
>> deprected, and indeed some parts are hardcoded (for example using -s
>> uses the proper sumtype for the meta-metadata, but still uses the
>> hardwired sha256 for the checksums of the packages themselves).
>>
>> Would it be possible to keep this switch for environments that need to
>> change the checksum types? I wonder how the fedora builders work that
>> use sha256 and sha checksums for differently aged Fedora releases, are
>> these different createrepos running in their own chroot?
>>
>> I'd prefer if possible a common createrepo that would allow choosing
>> the checksum type at runtime. I'd also try to come up with fixes to
>> 0.9.7 if there is interest.
>
> Check upstream git and latest 0.9.7 build in f11/rawhide - I already  
> undeprecated it.
>
> http://createrepo.baseurl.org/gitweb?p=createrepo.git;a=commitdiff;h=0d161131357bf4a195a35599a757aa35f6eb86a1

1000 thanks, and it looks like I was looking for the bits in

http://createrepo.baseurl.org/gitweb?p=createrepo.git;a=commitdiff;h=5dd00f425f64cdc1bfc1005f560fb4761abac007
"make sure the checksum type we use is being used everywhere."

I was using createrepo-0.9.7-1 from rawhide, I'll try git for the next
tests.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

_______________________________________________
Rpm-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-metadata
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 197 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkno2DEACgkQQBVS1GOamfHQiQCfYm9Ige7EJLVS8/VRnh2iEl37
Ia0An02ixG5eT+ahhYg8AG2vgk6VRJRx
=KXNV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.