Re: adding different compression types to createrepo
seth vidal <[email protected]> Tue, 03 Aug 2010 12:11:36 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.rpm.metadata |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1280851896.2506.144.camel@oliver> |
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 12:02 -0400, James Antill wrote: > *shrug*, I'm not sure why we'd want to add support for lzma on the > obsolete .xml files. Smart and apt both support .sqlite now, and if > zypper doesn't they can always use modifyrepo to add them for SuSE. > Also calling them "primary_db.xz" would fit the convention with > "groups.gz". nod. s/_xz/.xz/ yes. > > My biggest reticence in adding the xz support now is that if we move to > > changing the repodata format to the layout that's been discussed on here > > and on yum-devel list that we'll be able to move to xz support(and some > > future proofing for compression formatting) w/o having to kludge a bunch > > of xz compression crap into createrepo. > > Well it's going to be much easier to just change the compression, but > it's not the end of the world if you want to put it off a year or so > (IMO). like I said - reticence. Not decided at all. :-/ -sv