Re: discussion of createrepo and repodata format future
seth vidal <[email protected]> Fri, 06 Aug 2010 08:34:15 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.rpm.metadata |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1281098055.1345.273.camel@oliver> |
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 12:20 +0200, Duncan Mac-Vicar P. wrote: > I was thinking about the sqlite part, and I think the change has to go > in a way that > * assumes sqlite3 is _yum_ cache why? Why not just a random-access md? > * allows distros to use different cache strategies That's true even now. > > The sqlite types could go as extra data. Something like: > > <data type="filelists"> > <checksum > type="sha256">1ef045e8c2a00901b1c3591990b2ec2498d2ed1807b315622a89aa73e6811778</checksum> > <timestamp>1277771835</timestamp> > <size>1098607</size> > <open-size>15276280</open-size> > <open-checksum > type="sha256">7a620afa9594e0f9be4048d1968881079174b6a4600617f55da8bd0f0ae4a4a6</open-checksum> > <location href="repodata/filelists.xml.gz"/> > <cache-location format="sqlite3" href="repodata/filelists.xml.sqldb"/> > </data> I don't have a problem with that necessarily except that it means that every non-xml format is relegated to a 'cache', which I just don't think is true. When you think about it - the xml format is a cache, too. It's a compilation, truncation and compression of the data in the rpm hdrs. Something that we've kicked about is mix-and-match metadata fileformats based on what makes accessing them most functional. I know opensuse doesn't have to muck with filedeps in pkgs but do you resolve them for when a user knows the filename they need but not the pkg name? the equivalent of: yum install /usr/bin/myprogram If so - the discussion of breaking of the filelists into chunks based on subdirs might be beneficial to you. > Another problem that shows up is that caches may be different. For > example, yum has one file per metadata. We have just one solv file per > repository. But I guess that is just another tag under repomd tag. > Specifying the location, and the format, so that the downloader can > choose whether to use it or not. > > Also, what is the status of these tags? > > <revision>1277771829</revision> > <tags> > <repo>obsrepository://build.opensuse.org/openSUSE:11.2:Contrib/standard</repo> > </tags> They shouldn't need to change at all. In fact my original thoughts were that repomd.xml doesn't need to change, except to add an attribute of 'compression type' to each datatype. -sv