Re: discussion of createrepo and repodata format future

Klaus Kaempf <[email protected]> Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:55:57 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.rpm.metadata
Message-ID <[email protected]>
* seth vidal <[email protected]> [Aug 06. 2010 14:34]:
> 
> When you think about it - the xml format is a cache, too. It's a
> compilation, truncation and compression of the data in the rpm hdrs.
> 

Actually, it serves two purposes (requirements)

1. caching of rpm header information
2. providing a universally understood format ("XML's design goals
   emphasize simplicity, generality, and usability over the Internet"
   (according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XML)
   
I'd like to add a third requirement

3. minimize download time required by clients to update their knowledge
   about a repository
   
Having read through the archive of this discussion, the thread started
with a proposal to improve #3, namely adding a better compression
scheme.


Are there other or different requirements for a repository metadata
scheme ?

Klaus
---
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)

_______________________________________________
Rpm-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-metadata