Re: discussion of createrepo and repodata format future
Klaus Kaempf <[email protected]> Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:55:57 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.rpm.metadata |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* seth vidal <[email protected]> [Aug 06. 2010 14:34]: > > When you think about it - the xml format is a cache, too. It's a > compilation, truncation and compression of the data in the rpm hdrs. > Actually, it serves two purposes (requirements) 1. caching of rpm header information 2. providing a universally understood format ("XML's design goals emphasize simplicity, generality, and usability over the Internet" (according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XML) I'd like to add a third requirement 3. minimize download time required by clients to update their knowledge about a repository Having read through the archive of this discussion, the thread started with a proposal to improve #3, namely adding a better compression scheme. Are there other or different requirements for a repository metadata scheme ? Klaus --- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) _______________________________________________ Rpm-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-metadata