Re: discussion of createrepo and repodata format future
seth vidal <[email protected]> Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:24:47 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.rpm.metadata |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1281119087.1345.390.camel@oliver> |
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 19:15 +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote: > Right. is this an issue for opensuse? I know it's one for fedora b/c of wanting folks to be able to search for pkgs based on summary/description info in their own language. > Yes, that would be possible. It depends on how good each per-pkg chunk > compresses, I guess. > The advantage of the all chunks in one file with delta downloads is that > it doesn't clutter up the repo directory so much. Agreed - the thought was to have them all in a subdir with an index for them so you could get them and use the same gpg/x509 verifier for them. If you remove all the crazy you can make the full pkg metadata pretty small. > If rpms get deleted they also vanish from the metadata. But we tend > to keep the old rpms for reference, so usually only the number of packages > at the start of the xml data changes and new packages get appended. yah - the above is where we got into trouble in fedora - b/c the sheer volume of updates is a bit crushing if we tried to tack them on the end of the xml. This is part of the reason to looking at pure-sqlite repos so we could do all updates as just insert/deletes + repomd.xml regeneration. -sv