Re: discussion of createrepo and repodata format future

seth vidal <[email protected]> Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:24:47 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.linux.rpm.metadata
Message-ID <1281119087.1345.390.camel@oliver>
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 19:15 +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> Right.

is this an issue for opensuse? I know it's one for fedora b/c of wanting
folks to be able to search for pkgs based on summary/description info in
their own language.


> Yes, that would be possible. It depends on how good each per-pkg chunk
> compresses, I guess.
> The advantage of the all chunks in one file with delta downloads is that
> it doesn't clutter up the repo directory so much.

Agreed - the thought was to have them all in a subdir with an index for
them so you could get them and use the same gpg/x509 verifier for them.


If you remove all the crazy you can make the full pkg metadata pretty
small.


> If rpms get deleted they also vanish from the metadata. But we tend
> to keep the old rpms for reference, so usually only the number of packages
> at the start of the xml data changes and new packages get appended.


yah - the above is where we got into trouble in fedora - b/c the sheer
volume of updates is a bit crushing if we tried to tack them on the end
of the xml. This is part of the reason to looking at pure-sqlite repos
so we could do all updates as just insert/deletes + repomd.xml
regeneration.


-sv