Re: 2 commits - createrepo/__init__.py createrepo/utils.py genpkgmetadata.py mergerepo.py modifyrepo.py

seth vidal <[email protected]> Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:23:42 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.linux.rpm.metadata
Message-ID <1316204622.2636.142.camel@oliver>
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 22:02 +0200, Anders F Björklund wrote:
> Is that really needed ?
> 
> Like: the openSUSE program has the same name, even if it adds
> a few new tags for the weak dependencies (enhances/suggests) -
> and the rest are just backports of features already existing.
> 
> The only remaining patch is the fixed epoch/distepoch parsing ?
> Without it, the distepoch (:2011) is included in the release...
> Hardly seems worth to rename the program, for such a bugfix.
> 
> What is the confusion ?


You're creating a different set of repodata in primary/repomd.xml if
nothing else.

Now - someone using suse/mandriva will find a problem with how it makes
those and, when googling for where to report it, file a bug at
createrepo.baseurl.org. 

that's what I mean by confusion. It's the same problem I have whenever
there are patches into red hat or fedora yum/createrepo that don't make
it into upstream. This is why we try to never have those.

Do you see what I mean?

-sv


_______________________________________________
Rpm-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-metadata