Re: 2 commits - createrepo/__init__.py createrepo/utils.py genpkgmetadata.py mergerepo.py modifyrepo.py
seth vidal <[email protected]> Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:23:42 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.rpm.metadata |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1316204622.2636.142.camel@oliver> |
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 22:02 +0200, Anders F Björklund wrote: > Is that really needed ? > > Like: the openSUSE program has the same name, even if it adds > a few new tags for the weak dependencies (enhances/suggests) - > and the rest are just backports of features already existing. > > The only remaining patch is the fixed epoch/distepoch parsing ? > Without it, the distepoch (:2011) is included in the release... > Hardly seems worth to rename the program, for such a bugfix. > > What is the confusion ? You're creating a different set of repodata in primary/repomd.xml if nothing else. Now - someone using suse/mandriva will find a problem with how it makes those and, when googling for where to report it, file a bug at createrepo.baseurl.org. that's what I mean by confusion. It's the same problem I have whenever there are patches into red hat or fedora yum/createrepo that don't make it into upstream. This is why we try to never have those. Do you see what I mean? -sv _______________________________________________ Rpm-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-metadata