Re: two additional bits of data
seth vidal <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.rpm.metadata |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1067625480.9674.1.camel@opus> |
> The former, you mean? yah. I did mean the former. Sorry. > Build timestamps aren't referenced explicitly in debs, but all debs are > required to have a changelog with change dates in standardized format. > > If I were required to provide buildtime for debs, I'd use the changelog > date. I was thinking of wanting this metadata for something like 'recent' packages listings. -sv