Re: two additional bits of data

seth vidal <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.rpm.metadata
Message-ID <1067625480.9674.1.camel@opus>
> The former, you mean?

yah. I did mean the former. Sorry.


> Build timestamps aren't referenced explicitly in debs, but all debs are
> required to have a changelog with change dates in standardized format.
> 
> If I were required to provide buildtime for debs, I'd use the changelog
> date.

I was thinking of wanting this metadata for something like 'recent'
packages listings.

-sv
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.