Re: status questions

On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 14:35, Joe Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 01:31, seth vidal wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >  I was just wondering what people think of what we've come up with so
> > far. Does it seem workable for all the various projects/programs? Are
> > you comfortable with the file layout? 
> 
> Things seem well.  What happens when you run the script on a directory
> with multiple versions of a package?
> 
> >  - are the checksum-style ids consistent/compliant for everyone?
> 
> For RC it'll mean increased memory/processing overhead, as everything is
> done based on nevr.  It would be worthwhile making that an element in
> the additional metadata files instead of a comment now that I think
> about it more, but if not, we'll deal.
> 

done - I did that just the other night :)


> Sounds okay, although I wouldn't bend over backward for it.  I think if
> we all agree on it enough to add it to our projects that's endorsement
> enough (the freedesktop model as opposed to the lsb model).

cool.

-sv