Re: status questions

On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 14:46, Joe Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 14:38, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 14:35, Joe Shaw wrote:
> 
> > done - I did that just the other night :)
> 
> Great. :)
> 
> You're not off the hook, though, you didn't answer my other question...
> ;)
> 
> > > What happens when you run the script on a directory with multiple 
> > > versions of a package?
> 
> My feeling is that we should provide all versions of the package in the
> metadata, and make this abundantly clear in any specification
> definition.

damn - sorry - I just skipped this question.

yes. it includes all rpms - it makes no judgement about newer or older.

the script needs some getopt love but I wanted to make sure I didn't
have to move the xml stuff around too much before I did that.


-sv