Re: metadata future enhancement
Jeff Sheltren <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.rpm.metadata |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1076447817.28175.36.camel@forsberg> |
Sounds just like what yum does - it won't download the packages if you've already got them installed/downloaded. I think this is more of an updater/installer feature than a metadata feature, or am I just reading this wrong? -Jeff On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 12:19, Toshio wrote: > Something I think belongs in the metadata level is patch packages. I'm > not as big a proponent of patch packages as I was in 1998 when I was > stuck behind a 28K modem though, so I'm not pushing this as a "I think > it belongs in metadata now" just that if someone starts hosting patch > packages it needs to be integrated at the metadata level so my package > tool can automatically find what patch packages are available from the > repository metadata, compare them to my cache of local packages, and > choose to download accordingly. > > I don't know of any distribution except SuSE that has a patch package > repository yet, though. So I don't know if this belongs on the radar > yet or if it's a "think on it and wait until someone needs the it" > feature. > > -Toshio