Re: metadata future enhancement

Jeff Sheltren <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.rpm.metadata
Message-ID <1076447817.28175.36.camel@forsberg>
Sounds just like what yum does - it won't download the packages if
you've already got them installed/downloaded.  I think this is more of
an updater/installer feature than a metadata feature, or am I just
reading this wrong?

-Jeff

On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 12:19, Toshio wrote:
> Something I think belongs in the metadata level is patch packages.  I'm
> not as big a proponent of patch packages as I was in 1998 when I was
> stuck behind a 28K modem though, so I'm not pushing this as a "I think
> it belongs in metadata now" just that if someone starts hosting patch
> packages it needs to be integrated at the metadata level so my package
> tool can automatically find what patch packages are available from the
> repository metadata, compare them to my cache of local packages, and
> choose to download accordingly.
> 
> I don't know of any distribution except SuSE that has a patch package
> repository yet, though.  So I don't know if this belongs on the radar
> yet or if it's a "think on it and wait until someone needs the it"
> feature.
> 
> -Toshio
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.