Re: Createrepo on RedHat 9

Metadata <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.rpm.metadata
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Ha. Yeah, there are still a few stragglers running RH9 here that I
haven't found the time to upgrade yet (if it ain't broke :)

Anyhow, I updated to the latest libxml2 and libxml2-python and that
worked perfectly well. Thank you...

On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 20:59 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 14:15 -0600, Metadata wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I briefly searched the mailing list archives and didn't see anything
> > like this, so forgive me if this is common knowledge.
> > 
> > I'm using a RedHat 9 box to stores RPM repositories for RH 9, FC1, FC2
> > and now FC3. When using the "createrepo" command on the RedHat 9 box to
> > create the repodata directories, everything seems to go well, but
> > the .tar.gz files that it creates don't actually contain any package
> > data inside of them.
> > 
> > My work-around for this problem was to NFS mount the RedHat 9
> > directories and to use "createrepo" on a Fedora Core 3 box in order to
> > generate the repodata information. This solution worked flawlessly,
> > however, I was wondering if you guys had any idea why the "createrepo"
> > command doesn't actually generate the proper data file when used locally
> > on the RH9 box, as this would be my preferred solution.
> > 
> > Thanks much for any ideas you can provide.
> 
> update libxml2 and libxml2-python to a newer version.
> 
> oh and stop using EOL'd distributions. :)
> 
> -sv
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rpm-metadata mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/rpm-metadata
> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.