Re: dtd and validation
Féliciano Matias <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.rpm.metadata |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le dimanche 16 janvier 2005 à 15:09 -0500, Daniel Veillard a écrit : > On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 09:00:59PM +0100, Féliciano Matias wrote: > > I am trying to learn XML (It's very _very_ very (!) hard...). > > Meuh non ! Bêêê oui ! For an average joe like me. > > > If the dtd is useless, then it should be removed. > > nahh, it just need to be updated to reflect the current state You mean that the w3c should update the dtd of html to feet with the "state of the art" of IE ? Internet Explorer is a recommendation of the w3c ? The dtd should have a version and the xml files should indicate the dtd used (or it try to conform). > That should not be too hard, sounds even a good exercise in improving > your XML knowledge Why not. But with which one : - DTD - XSD - Relax-NG (Every month there is a "Next Generation"...). > (and next one is to write a Relax-NG schemas for it [1]) ;-) Why Relax-NG ? XSD seems fine and it's a recommendation of w3c. > Daniel > > [1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/relax-ng/tutorial-20011203.html > _______________________________________________ Rpm-metadata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/rpm-metadata
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBB6tTpAlHlXNHHbFMRAmpeAKCTWzRcmISZS9KmlI6Ljd3YcgNqygCdGYWQ whbzWPuv0j2tnZ4JF2zKPp4= =DaZv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----