Re: Testing on HEAD

On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 00:51 +0200, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
> Am Freitag, 28. Juli 2006 21:51 schrieb Paul Nasrat:
> > On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 15:47 -0400, Paul Nasrat wrote:
> > > I think I've fixed up the relative/absolute/split path cases with
> > > the new os.path.walk based finder.  I've nuked the unit tests for
> > > now but I'd be gratefull if people could test out HEAD and see if
> > > it's working from them in their use cases.
> > >
> > > I know I need to make the cache code paths write to the correct
> > > outputdir.  So if someone can clarify the expected behaviour I'll
> > > do that.
> >
> > Actually I reread my mail and HEAD should now behave like it did
> > previously for relative cache dir (and now it'll work with
> > --outputdir too!).
> 
> Confirmed. In the typical usage modes, this version behaves just as 
> before you broke it ;-) Haven't looked at --outputdir or --split 
> options, yet, but rediffed my timestamp check option. Mind looking 
> into it this time, and just tell, if this has a chance to go in or not.

Sorry for the delay on this I've commited this to HEAD, it'll be in the
next release.

Paul