Re: detached gpg signature on repomd.xml
Jesse Keating <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.rpm.metadata |
|---|---|
| Organization | Red Hat |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Saturday 26 August 2006 13:36, seth vidal wrote: > it'd be the same as signing packages. > > Someone's got to be there or you have to have a key available that's not > encrypted. > > I wasn't going to suggest that this be mandatory - just as an option for > repositories where it would be useful. What about x509 cert rather than gpg? -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora _______________________________________________ Rpm-metadata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/rpm-metadata
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBE8MW84v2HLvE71NURAtAiAKC6DL0Xz1nKvW93G8cmKMYdKzdkpwCglpWu 73mDeApwtn9Xxs9ERNQdghE= =+fhc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----