Re: repomd format
seth vidal <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.rpm.metadata |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1164692635.28663.48.camel@cutter> |
On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 17:54 +0100, Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett wrote: > Hi guys. > > Our current repomd format (with some extensions) is like: > > <repomd> > <data type="patches"> > <location href="repodata/patches.xml"/> > <checksum type="sha">faf479e9f961bafabcab2c18eb60687de2b0a569</checksum> > <timestamp>1164040210</timestamp> > <open-checksum > type="sha">faf479e9f961bafabcab2c18eb60687de2b0a569</open-checksum> > </data> > </repomd> > > Fedora uses the same. > > However, if you go to: > http://linux.duke.edu/projects/metadata/dtd/repomd.dtd > > you realize the format is like: > > When did it change? > It didn't, really. The other aspects of the defined format never really caught on and then we kinda drifted a bit. To be fair this list and the discussion have languished over the last year or so mainly b/c I've been busy with other items and haven't had as much time to spend on them. If you're interested in cleaning up items like this, or if anyone is, let me know. I'll be glad to give interested/motivated people who would like to help clean this up access to do just that. thanks, -sv