Re: upgrade from 32-bit to 64-bit
Dennis Gilmore <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.rpm.yum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Once upon a time Saturday 24 February 2007, Gerry Reno wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > I wouldn't bet on that working reliably or sanely. > > > > if you don't mind messing around for a long time you can give it a try, > > but it's nothing we've ever tested or would suggest someone counting on > > not breaking everything :) > > > > -sv > > Seth, > Actually reliably and sanely is what I am seeking :-) I'm actually > faced with eventually doing this on about a dozen servers so I need to > develop a procedure that works reliably. Any insights or suggestions as > to how to attempt this would be most appreciated. > > Gerry I did it on one box. and it mostly works fine. but the box does some goofy things at times. I would recommend against doing it. after the upgrade i still had to clean alot of things up. In all seriousness I dont think it is a sane thing to do. I am going to rebuild the box i did it on soon because of the quirks Dennis _______________________________________________ Yum mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBF4JDtkSxm47BaWfcRAt1HAJ9JrR9YJPczXKNYMrHYlMk/aGekQQCgm4tF 8UpXD9YPpAWiSJ4RLUfkTUY= =HZHM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----