Re: yum 3.2.x on CentOS 5?

Matthew Miller <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.rpm.yum
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 04:01:07PM +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> > > of 3.0.x. I did a similar thing for our older releases, and it turned out
> > > to be a) the right choice and b) full of surprises. Anything in particular I
> > > should be aware of this time around? Am I okay with the default sqlite
> > > version (sqlite-3.3.6)? What about python-sqlite (no longer a separate
> > > package in Python 2.5, I see....)
> > No hints, eh. No problem, I'll just charge ahead blindly. :)
> B.t.w., your original remarks "a) the right choice" and "b) full of
> surprises" sounded pretty much like a contradiction to me... ;-)

Thankfully, none of them were unappeasable surprises, but yes, I'm hoping
for a least an equal measure of "a" with a lot less "b" this time around. :)

So far, the only issues I've found are "don't upgrade yum-metadata-parser
first" and "createrepo 0.4.10 works differently with symlinks".

-- 
Matthew Miller           [email protected]          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.