Re: RE: yum compatibility backward with rpm
Les Mikesell <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.rpm.yum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
seth vidal wrote:
> However, given what you've described I'm curious how small, small is for
> you. I've gotten a fedora6/centos5 box down to 97pkgs - roughly a 350MB
> install. That's pretty trim. That included rpm, python and yum plus the
> networking tools. I'm pretty sure there was no mta on there. and I did
> all of that w/i correctly closed dependencies.
Does anyone know how that compares to what you'd have with a rPath based
system?
--
Les Mikesell
[email protected]