RE: RE: yum compatibility backward with rpm

"Skahan, Vince" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.rpm.yum
Message-ID <448F0AE69241D84D8775D07C6FAB5D8E06746F6B@XCH-NW-4V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Just in case anybody cares, a minimal FC6 using Jesse's list and just
about today's updated rpms results in a initrd that is 383MB in size
(before gzip) which boots just fine into a 512MB ramdisk.

When I get done stripping it down manually, I have a 138 MB image that
still includes all 48 MB of kernel modules.  Based on past history given
I only have to support some pretty basic hardware, I'm guessing I can
get that minimal-list-of-rpms system to 110 MB or so before gzipping the
initrd without too much pain.

Pretty cool, no need to go busybox or really embedded for a
ramdisk-based router/firewall box.  Just throw 128MB ramdisk at the
problem for a few bucks...

------ [email protected] ------



-----Original Message-----
From: Skahan, Vince 
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 8:52 PM
To: Yellowdog Updater, Modified; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Yum] RE: yum compatibility backward with rpm


[...]

My current FC4 (not bare minimum, about 150 rpms) is ballpark 150MB
footprint.  So far I have FC6 at about 210 MB on disk hand-stripped ala
above, but I have lots of rpms to go.  I'll take Jesse's rpm list, build
something with the FC6 versions, and then hand-strip it down just to see
how small it can gets before+after for comparison.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.