Re: Re: yum 3.2.13 released

seth vidal <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.rpm.yum
Message-ID <1206391469.31693.48.camel@cutter>
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 21:10 +0100, Bart van Kuik wrote:
> seth vidal wrote:
>  > Additionally, James Antill has committed
>  > some code that slightly increases memory use during depsolving but
>  > increases the speed of certain depsolving routines between 30% and
> 
> Hi,
> 
> For people using yum on systems with limited resources (virtual machines 
> or small footprint systems), it would be great if memory consuming 
> options could be influenced through a setting in /etc/yum.conf
> 
> Are such configuration options feasible for the developers?
> 

in the 3.2.X development cycle we've dropped memory use by about 40%, so
the small memory use bump of James' patch doesn't make a dent in the
overall savings we've seen in the last 4-5 releases of yum.

so, in answer to your question: unlikely.

-sv
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.