Re: Fwd: yum rollback !!
"Satish Eerpini" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.rpm.yum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
well Fajar, i didnt quite understand your point, how is storage related to the roll back functionality , ... ? can u explain a bit , or refer some resources from where i can understand this ? Thanks Satish On 4/1/08, Fajar A. Nugraha <[email protected]> wrote: > > Satish Eerpini wrote: > > hi Fajar > > yes , i actually didn't know that , but what if we make use of the > > system file database > I'm not sure what you mean by "system file database". > > > to trace back all the file changes that happened > > after the rollback date and then trace back these files to RPM > > packages using the databases in the repositiories, ...that would be > > fast and a more correct way of doing it ?? > > what say ? > > > > > > An easier method would be to use some kind of versioning on storage level. > For example : > > - Using Linux on top of LVM with LVM snapshot feature (I haven't test it > much) > - Using Linux on top of SAN storage with flash-copy/snapshot capability > - Using Linux on top of iscsi-exported zfs emulated volume > - Using Linux (kernel 2.4) on top of solaris brandZ zone, running on zfs > > That way the storage will handle snapshot and rollback, not yum. > > Regards, > > Fajar > > _______________________________________________ > Yum mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum > > > _______________________________________________ Yum mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum