Re: Fwd: yum rollback !!

"Satish Eerpini" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.rpm.yum
Message-ID <[email protected]>
well Fajar, i didnt quite understand your point, how is storage related to
the roll back functionality , ... ?
can u explain a bit , or refer some resources from where i can understand
this ?

Thanks
Satish


On 4/1/08, Fajar A. Nugraha <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Satish Eerpini wrote:
> > hi Fajar
> > yes , i actually didn't know that , but what if we make use of the
> > system file database
> I'm not sure what you mean by "system file database".
>
> > to trace back all the file changes that happened
> > after the rollback date and then trace back these files to RPM
> > packages using the databases in the repositiories, ...that would be
> > fast and a more correct way of doing it ??
> > what say ?
> >
> >
>
> An easier method would be to use some kind of versioning on storage level.
> For example :
>
> - Using Linux on top of LVM with LVM snapshot feature (I haven't test it
> much)
> - Using Linux on top of SAN storage with flash-copy/snapshot capability
> - Using Linux on top of iscsi-exported zfs emulated volume
> - Using Linux (kernel 2.4) on top of solaris brandZ zone, running on zfs
>
> That way the storage will handle snapshot and rollback, not yum.
>
> Regards,
>
> Fajar
>
> _______________________________________________
> Yum mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Yum mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.