Re: check-update question
"Jim Perrin" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.rpm.yum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 4:44 AM, Barry O'Rourke <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > We've got a custom repository that hosts all of our self packaged RPM's and > have grouped all of the RPM's together in a group called ifp-base. We run a > daily script that uses "yum check-update" to verify whether we need to run a > full update. > > check-update behaves as expected if we add an updated version of an existing > RPM, the problem is that it doesn't seem to know that we've added a *new* > package to the group, so as far as our script is concerned there is no > updates to be run even though there is a new package in the repo. This is expected behavior, as 'new' packages are not updates to packages that you have installed on the system. If check-updates reports packages which are added to the repository but are not installed on the system, then quite soon you'd be drowning in notifications as folks tend to only have a small percentage of the overall packages from a repo installed. Perhaps a better method would be to generate rss data for the repository and use it? -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell