Re: dependency failure w/ yum (and pirut), ok with rpm -i

seth vidal <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.rpm.yum
Message-ID <1235420913.17620.0.camel@rosebud>
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 15:08 -0500, Maurizio Vitale wrote:
> David Timms <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> >
> > There seems to be both 32 and 64 bit packages that are
> > mentioned. Perhaps there is an older version of the 32 bit that is
> > tripping yum up ?
> 
> Mhhh, this shouldn't be the case. Which prompted me to crosscheck the
> rpms and indeed what I was downloading in one VM was not what I was
> uploading from the other. Of course a stale copy was present where the
> installer was looking for it. 
> 
> Once that's been fixed everything is fine: I can install on a very clean
> CentOS an RPM package that has been created on a much less clean
> development CentOS.
> 
> Now that stale copy mentioned above was created on OpenSUSE and
> installing fine there. Is there this much sensitivity on the machine
> where the RPM is created? I certainly hope to be able to create RPMs
> that can be installed using the native package manager on many/all RPM
> based distributions. Is that a naive expectation on my part and should I
> just focus on CentOS/RHEL, or is just a matter of me needing to learn
> more about RPM packaging?
> 
> Any link to doc on multi-distribution RPM packaging?
> 

Generally the doc is: Don't do it, you will end up hating your world.

-sv
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.