Re: yum critical: <XYZ> was supposed to be installed but is not

Seth Vidal wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Martin Vogt wrote:
> 
>> Seth Vidal wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Martin Vogt wrote:
>>>

>>
>> Currently I'm doing some tests with the spec file. For example,
>> removing the %files (which works without error) now I'm removing
>> the %changelog and add the files back etc...
>> The only problem is that yum should behave the same regardless off
>> update file vs. http. Thats right.
> 
>> From what you've said above you mean one is a localpackage and the 
> other is from a repo? that's a slight difference.
> 

Yes, the kernel-source.rpm comes from my repo, but the localpackage is in:

/var/cache/yum/R0_os11.1/packages/kernel-source-2.6.27.25-0.1.1.x86_64.rpm

so its the package which I downloaded from my repo.
(The md5sum for the localpackage and the repo are the same, I checked that)

And regardless of the critical warning, the package is installed.
A simple rpm -U /var/cache/.../kernel-source.rpm does not show db errors
and doing a
rpm -U http://reposerver/tmp/kernel-source-2.6.27.25-0.1.1.x86_64.rpm
works too.
The only thing which I currently know, is this critical warning with
"yum udpate" and if I update "more" rpms, the db error.

Martin