Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Joshua Burns <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.rpm.yum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks for the information and the suggestion. We are currently roughly 45% Linux, 45% Solaris, and 10% (probably less) AIX. Solaris has been declared an end-of-life environment by the global OS architecture team. That means that within 3-5 years, we will probably be 95% Linux (RHEL), and 5% AIX. Bearing this in mind, YUM/RPM again seem like the obvious choice. Maybe I misread things, but when researching this a lot of RPM/YUM proponents mentioned its cross-platform capability as a big selling point of the technology - and since I'm not hearing that it won't work, or I shouldn't do it [from the developers], I am going to at least try to get this issue resolved so that we can move forward. I'd rather not be stuck with some [relatively] obscure or expensive product that doesn't really make sense in a 95% RHEL environment in a few years. --- On Fri, 11/13/09, Brian Long <[email protected]> wrote: From: Brian Long <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Yum] YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success To: [email protected] Date: Friday, November 13, 2009, 10:04 AM On 11/12/2009 08:29 PM, Joshua Burns wrote: <snip> the project goals include > > 1) a method of repository management, distribution and dependency > management, and > 2) a single vector/tool/technology allowing a single set of packaging > tools and a single repository across the enterprise I've not tried it, but this looks like what you need: http://www.openpkg.org/ /Brian/ -- Brian Long | | Corporate Security Programs Org . | | | . | | | . ' ' C I S C O _______________________________________________ Yum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum _______________________________________________ Yum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum