Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Joshua Burns <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.rpm.yum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Does YUM (or portions of YUM) have to be re-built, or does this only require rebuilding the RPM binaries/shared objects, etc. ? --- On Fri, 11/13/09, Seth Vidal <[email protected]> wrote: From: Seth Vidal <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Yum] YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success To: "Yellowdog Updater, Modified" <[email protected]> Date: Friday, November 13, 2009, 12:52 PM On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, Joshua Burns wrote: > Hi, > > The RPM version is 4.4.2.3 - I selected it primarily because it matches the version that is distributed with RHEL 5.x (we > are using the standard vendor-supplied RPM with Linux). Not really sure about patch level of RPM itself - I got the > source from a tape archive directly from the development site. Is there a way I can tell by looking at the source files? > > Below is a capture of the truss(1) output from yum (first), then rpm(second). > okay - then you're missing a bunch of patches most likely. Grab the srpm from rhel5.4 for rpm and check out all the patches that are applied. Try those out on your solaris build - tell me if any of them make the difference. I SWEAR I remember this problem affecting something else. -sv -----Inline Attachment Follows----- _______________________________________________ Yum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum _______________________________________________ Yum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum