Re: Update on "Yum install fails on Solaris, reports success" thread

Dennis Gilmore <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.rpm.yum
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Monday 30 November 2009 04:29:24 pm Joshua Burns wrote:
> Hi - my apologies for the premature send.
> 
> After building versions
> 
> 1) 4.4.2.3 stock from dev site
> 2) 4.4.2.3-18 RHEL patches
> 3) 4.1.7 stock from dev site, and then finally
> 4) 5.1.9 from rpm5.org site
curious as to why you did not try 4.7 series that is in fedora. 

Dennis

_______________________________________________
Yum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAksVKyoACgkQkSxm47BaWfdCbgCgoe0WGg72kwHeioavUs9K2Knj
g1UAoKyeXlH1tZ3Ez4MigR2WPq8yMhcU
=Anll
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.