Re: yum fails to install most up to date version

Ljubomir Ljubojevic <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.rpm.yum
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Jim Perrin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Maria Alandes Pradillo
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> If I run "yum install glite-VOBOX" I get lcg-infosites 2.6.2-1. However, if I get "yum update" later, I get lcg-infosites 2.6.8-2. Shouldn't I get the most up to date version from the beginning? Is this the expected behaviour?
> 
> Your example is somewhat oversimplified. There are a few dozen things
> which come into play when you're looking at this. If they are
> different architecture packages, and one has exactarch enabled, a
> newer package may be ignored if it doesn't match. The packages could
> have an epoch value set which makes the older one newer (nasty RPM
> trick). Certain yum plugins could be affecting the results also, such
> as priorities or protectbase.
> 
> Your best bet is to run your yum command with debugging output so that
> we (and you) can see exactly what is going on. Add '-d6' to your yum
> command to get all the debugging output you'll likely ever need. I'd
> also recommend doing a 'yum clean metadata' or 'yum clean all' prior
> to testing, so that you're sure you're getting fresh results.
> 
> 

As I can see it, possible reason is that glite-VOBOX is build with 
"Requires: lcg-infosites = 2.6.2-1" in it's spec file. In that case, 
Maria needs newer or recompiled version of glite-VOBOX that will either 
have "Requires: lcg-infosites >= 2.6.2-1" or "Requires: lcg-infosites = 
2.6.8-2".
Solution for now would be "yum update -x lcg-infosites" do prevent 
lcg-infosites from updating with the rest of the packages.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.