Re: createrep question

"Kidwell,jr, Jack" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.rpm.yum
Message-ID <997BC128AE961E4A8B880CD7442D9480141208E3@NJCHLEXCMB01.cable.comcast.com>
The package worked in rpm, but not in yum.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Panu Matilainen
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 5:03 PM
To: Yellowdog Updater, Modified
Subject: Re: [Yum] createrep question

On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Seth Vidal wrote:
>
> On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Kidwell,jr, Jack wrote:
>
>> Seth,
>> 
>> Thank you for patiently seeing this through. I'm the guy with the
>> yum-unfriendly COTS RPM. The vendor saw the light and fixed their
RPM,
>> so it's yummy!
>
> glad to hear it - I'm still just a little bit curious how they were
building 
> it before, though.

Mmmh, a package without sourcerpm tag rings a certain jRPM bell in my 
head. OTOH rpm should notice its missing and fake it if it otherwise
looks 
like a binary package, but how exactly all this works depends on rpm 
version.

 	- Panu -
_______________________________________________
Yum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.