Re: Roadmap of the RSBAC

Daniel Cegielka <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.rsbac
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Gergely Loónyai pisze:
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks. I care to take back to Mandriva this kernel. It was the reason of replace that:
> 
> RSBAC :
> - no longer maintained.
> - Used only by Mandriva.

and Gentoo - RSBAC, PaX + gcc with SSP and PIE. Do you need more? ;-)

> - No documentation
Yes, this is really some problem ;-]

> 
> I love this security solution and i would like if include the RSBAC on Mandriva again. 
> 

I love this too ;)
daniel


> Aleph
> 
> From: Amon Ott <[email protected]>
>> On Saturday 18 October 2008 13:14, Gergely Loónyai wrote:
>>> Sorry this question but i must clean viewing the futures of this
>>> project. What is your plan for future? I not find roadmap on
>>> website, and i view slow up this project. I hat build upon to rsbac
>>> in the long run?
>> RSBAC is still under active development, but we have all been very 
>> busy for a while. I can assure you that it will be there for a long 
>> time to go, because we use it as key component in our company 
>> products, too. And yes, it is still fun, so I at least would continue 
>> anyway. :)
>>
>> The roadmap / todo will be updated soon. You can expect the new 1.4 
>> release for 2.6.27 within the next weeks, unless we find more 
>> significant bugs. Support for 2.4 kernels has been split out to get 
>> cleaner code, but is still maintained and available through svn.
>>
>> Amon.
>> -- 
>> http://www.rsbac.org - GnuPG: 2048g/5DEAAA30 2002-10-22
>> _______________________________________________
>> rsbac mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.rsbac.org/mailman/listinfo/rsbac
> _______________________________________________
> rsbac mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.rsbac.org/mailman/listinfo/rsbac

_______________________________________________
rsbac mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.rsbac.org/mailman/listinfo/rsbac
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.