Re: Boot Role
Javier Juan Martínez Cabezón <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.rsbac |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAD98N_Hbvgx83GcTRKAiNLX+fKp1tUdZSnQdyVaSn2jY-AwMjA@mail.gmail.com> |
I think it's the key of this question because if I'm not wrong inherited mixed proc/user parameter is not the switch by default now. 2011/8/15 Jens Kasten <[email protected]> > > More information about which kernel- and rsbac version would helpfull > but not lead automatic to success in this case ;) > > In my case i would avoid to use the Boot Role and General Role for all > services. > > Grüße > Jens > > > Am Montag, den 15.08.2011, 12:10 -0700 schrieb ali valizadeh: > > Hello all, > > > > I have compiled RSBAC kernel with RC and AUTH modules enabled. I could > set AUTH policy to boot system with it (RC is in softmode). However I > couldn't boot system with RC. I have checked that at boot time /sbin/init > contains the Boot Role (999999) as initial_role but the system couldn't boot > with the role. There are many "NOT_GRANTED by RC" in processes such as > dbus-daemon, avahi-daemon, hal-daemon and others. If init process is the > parent of other processes, and RSBAC system support inheritance, why the > other processes can't get Boot Role (in my test the role of other processes > is General user (0) and I expect it to be Boot Role!)? > > > > Please help me to boot system with the Boot Role (999999). Thanks in > advance for your help. > > > > > > Regards, > > Ali > > _______________________________________________ > > rsbac mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.rsbac.org/mailman/listinfo/rsbac > > > _______________________________________________ > rsbac mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.rsbac.org/mailman/listinfo/rsbac >