Re: Boot Role

Javier Juan Martínez Cabezón <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.rsbac
Message-ID <CAD98N_Hbvgx83GcTRKAiNLX+fKp1tUdZSnQdyVaSn2jY-AwMjA@mail.gmail.com>
I think it's the key of this question because if I'm not wrong inherited
mixed proc/user parameter is not the switch by default now.

2011/8/15 Jens Kasten <[email protected]>

>
> More information about which kernel- and rsbac version would helpfull
> but not lead automatic to success in this case ;)
>
> In my case i would avoid to use the Boot Role and General Role for all
> services.
>
> Grüße
> Jens
>
>
> Am Montag, den 15.08.2011, 12:10 -0700 schrieb ali valizadeh:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I have compiled RSBAC kernel with RC and AUTH modules enabled. I could
> set AUTH policy to boot system with it (RC is in softmode). However I
> couldn't boot system with RC. I have checked that at boot time /sbin/init
> contains the Boot Role (999999) as initial_role but the system couldn't boot
> with the role. There are many "NOT_GRANTED by RC" in processes such as
> dbus-daemon, avahi-daemon, hal-daemon and others. If init process is the
> parent of other processes, and RSBAC system support inheritance, why the
> other processes can't get Boot Role (in my test the role of other processes
> is General user (0) and I expect it to be Boot Role!)?
> >
> > Please help me to boot system with the Boot Role (999999). Thanks in
> advance for your help.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ali
> > _______________________________________________
> > rsbac mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.rsbac.org/mailman/listinfo/rsbac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rsbac mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.rsbac.org/mailman/listinfo/rsbac
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.