Re: ACL different between kernel 3.0.8 and 3.2.9
Amon Ott <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.rsbac |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Monday 05 March 2012 wrote Javier Juan Martínez Cabezón: > Yes, this bug was solved with 1.4.6 version release, so call to > READ_WRITE_OPEN is the correct and then followed by a READ (or WRITE) > Request access to the content of the file and not just a READ, WRITE > call without the former one. > > The trouble were in a modification in the open call by kernel developers > unknown to rsbac developers at first time that made all open calls to go > to READ instead READ_OPEN calls. Since READ_WRITE_OPEN is a open(O_RDWR) > call I suppose that this scenary applies to this request too. This is correct. Jens' policy has obviously been written with the broken interception and needs to be adjusted for the fixed code. Amon. -- http://www.rsbac.org - GnuPG: 2048g/5DEAAA30 2002-10-22 _______________________________________________ rsbac mailing list [email protected] http://www.rsbac.org/mailman/listinfo/rsbac