Re: unfsd access is broken too...

Amon Ott <[email protected]> Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:44:35 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.rsbac
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Friday 13 July 2012 wrote Lorenzo Marcantonio:
> It seems it only checks posix stuffs and doesn't even setuid...
>
> IMHO RSBAC without a working NFS implementation is almost a showstopper.
>
> What alternatives are there? smb mounts are only for single users AFAIK

For security reasons, I strongly recommend a user space solution, no matter 
what protocol - nfsd, samba, glusterfsd, ceph daemons, ...

Amon.
-- 
http://www.rsbac.org - GnuPG: 2048g/5DEAAA30 2002-10-22