Re: irc handbook organization and planning discussion

On 8/26/13 4:08 PM, Javier Juan Martínez Cabezón wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi folks, I think we need to talk in the irc about our handbook. I
> think we should make structural changes in it. But of course I need
> your opinions, critics and other stuff you could think of interest.
>
> Kang, Michal, Amon, and everyone who has participated in any aspect in
> RSBAC, could you get into the irc? Which days and in which hours would
> have you available to get in there?. Normally at least I could be
> present weekends and inside week, at afternoons.
>
> We could focus too in which aspects in the handbook should be improved
> first, I would do it (the only one I don't have deep knowledge is PM),
>
> I have already added some info in CAP but it could be modified soon in
> the future (for example putting together CAP description and
> configuration because I think it would be more clear to the reader).
>
> To save your mind health, we could do some way to organize commits to
> them  (something like having an "unstable handbook" and after
> stabilized commit them to stable handbook)
>
> Thanks for all for your attention.
>
Thanks for your initiative. Yes, I'm still reading this list :)

I'd say let's do it with a small 'only if'. It's a very busy time for me 
(and I know kang too, since we're in the same team :). The Q3 is about 
to wrap, there are goals to deliver, there's 'current' work to be done, 
and the time is seriously limited by flying here and there. Enough to 
say I'll end up this year with like 70 - 80 000km millage ;)

Can we do the editing on the mailing list instead? Ask and answer 
question and find someone to put it all together. Finding multiple small 
time slots is much easier than a large ones, the later being in fact 
impossible for the next 6-7 weeks.

Just my 2c :)