Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer
Philip Hands <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.skolelinux.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> writes: > Hi, > > I know Debian Edu members are reading the debian-blends list but to > be very sure I put their list in CC. > > Am Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:11:00AM +0100 schrieb Cyril Brulebois: >> Philip Hands <[email protected]> (2024-12-12): >> > I think I was perhaps forgetting that tasksel (and so blendsel) rely on >> > the installed system to do what they do, so one cannot push them earlier >> > in the order without more effort than I had in mind. >> > >> > I still think it might be worth having an early question where it might >> > be possible to add more complexity later, just to provide a hook where >> > people like Debian-Edu could start developing things. >> > >> > On the other hand, having a "Do you want to install a Blend?" question >> > immediately after the locale selection seems a bit weird, and would be >> > rather annoying if answering it wrong would lead to blendsel not >> > appearing after tasksel, when one had hoped it would. >> > >> > I guess some feedback from blends folk about what they're hoping for >> > would help at this point. Perhaps blendsel is just what most people had >> > in mind, in which case the likes of Debian-Edu just need to continue >> > with their custom D-I. >> >> As far as I can remember, at least Andreas was fine/happy with the idea >> proposed by Holger (which also matched what I had in mind to make some >> progress there), so I don't see why we should disrupt the install flow >> with an early question for very specific usecases… > > I confirm I was very happy about Holger's proposal and it might make > sense to keep things as simple as possible for the moment. My gut > feeling is that Debian Edu people consider their pre-seeding as a solved > problem. Since the request to offer some Blends selection inside the > installer did not came from Debian Edu its fine for them to stick to the > original proposal doing the Blends selection after tasksel. That's good to know -- In that case it sounds like this is going to deal with many/most blends' needs while only needing minimal changes to D-I, which is great. :-) Cheers, Phil. -- Philip Hands -- https://hands.com/~phil
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 832 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE3/FBWs4yJ/zyBwfW0EujoAEl1cAFAmdeBMIACgkQ0EujoAEl 1cCnZBAAiEjW4XSLKAUsCusfnwFpT0an7ISHQGYzR4eGmM5cI7joVSEBr76iXsso PYt1EwqMPaVODuBJJ2ONK7bHfwCHdPEJzSYbClaUbEajvE4D46aM1+dLfIMLXp5G 6yah9DD/FEJ/Hfxdcr1UjhYfuHm/0vEdaXar7aIgfoPVD0ms0OENUnULbCRm4/Mf +sS4JK4ea0b2V2Ehkq/XaMCsTWIwoWBULz6T4hiIj6Jftrtr3eRTqipm2naguywO EFNniibCe7MpsIEJLavXv+GcfLeG1f38NMeyUMeP760UFIM9NxUWxANM9Th3FUuc Yh0SBJrVZCQd3ecRiSYYHweQ05PWjZQR/pm/rVT6LLlR//R/m3oKX8ZRFuLqG+4z TEwTTmM5MKinf2Q/Wknr8212If5Jz8hur7TivNTpiSnz9UFQUBuaep41xFqTkIwU VxdGcuvN+JN26X3REtBv8qcfScKRsk9z/KvcG5ZvVxCfZ8spkCkLg79dsIN1kIW0 9WpvYKij6YGLWzvHuO6cadcgyOca0fHD9NvxkVo139/MrYZi/0oPusFlXZ61tpzf /FcP8guzl4k60e3yD7C3AcWkbLpKJkb3+l/z3l5rjivrPudywtvwkenJFzZ0E89j QLdrc5a0iRjjQrUNEZNtOi4oR5SrQH+Lzu6ZsZmzzyCV4swQCGE= =UBhb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----