Re: Why no docs for ruby ?

Vincent Batts <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.slackware
Message-ID <CAN6Zp5x8cHmFUq=09qM01nfu6UAw4dSuqDPwSt++z=C0AnsV2Q@mail.gmail.com>
This is true. I just put a simple build up
http://slackware.com/~vbatts/ruby/ that just builds an addendum package
called 'ruby-doc'
I lobbied for this SlackBuild to be in /extra/, but we can't all get what
we want ;-)

Take care,
vb

p.s. simple command to fetch it:
$> lftp -c "open http://slackware.com/~vbatts/ruby/; mirror ruby-doc"
 On Oct 10, 2012 9:14 PM, "Willy Sudiarto Raharjo" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
> I can see in the .SlackBuild script that ruby is configured with
>>         --disable-install-doc
>> option, and I can also see old ruby package for Slackware 13.1 used to
>> include ri documentation in /usr/share/ri/. Currently I get no
>> /usr/share/ri folder after installing the ruby package.
>>
>> Why was the documentation removed ? Can the ruby package please include
>> ruby documentation again ?
>>
>> I think the reason is to save some space
> You can always rebuilt the package and remove or change the parameter to
> include documentation
>
>
> --
> Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
> Personal Blog : http://willysr.blogspot.com
> Linux Blog: http://slackblogs.blogspot.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> slackware mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/slackware
>

_______________________________________________
slackware mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/slackware
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.