Re: RC Scripts question
Noel Butler <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.slackware |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1353845194.23595.28.camel@tardis> |
On Sun, 2012-11-25 at 11:44 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote: > > Am I correct in assuming this means if I set the ulimit to 8192 for > rc.M that all called scripts will get a ulimit raise to 8192? > NFI, but - > Also, conversely if I call, say, rc.httpd with a ulimit of 8192 will > that be honored or ignored? > I think yes, we run our POP3 servers (dovecot) with #!/bin/sh # Start/stop/restart dovecot. ulimit -n 8192 and they run fine, if we start it in a normal shell, it whinges because not enough FD available. Same for our news server, as for web servers, we call them with 4096 from the apachectl script - since rc.httpd normally calls that, best to up your limits from in there. > google is full of so much mis-information)? > Now, that we can agree on _______________________________________________ slackware mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/slackware
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 490 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJQsgnKAAoJECg/hgl/0DbHW9QH/2qW2l05/kNk7EafPVblwVjX kbN2msC2ZAogJXvk1LlBnmi/BTzN381RSUllEiEZJ5BEtks4cEhI2cDNDV/fMQMK FeiERM8CnF4PH7G4LEVAQl/t7+4XN/+ASyFHIYzCRx4wEzqfSTf31qm4obPum5zI OoFAZTkPzEI1Ut5iH5lNRqeVQx1U+Yrj4sNBS5fhfoMByPp9ocesBadJj3EPblJJ TzzTrJy/bleCXWSALuwT/TklclNwKdgO0I3LmhNBp8pu85bLfZofoLtZ2XrHpZdc vNPh65bE0F3UKQTirCJ+UO9YEXax7qeuoXm4mmN0QFtgEXqI1kGVBiXtTlB20H4= =siik -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----