Re: Why no docs for ruby ?

Aslo, I forgot to follow-up here, but the latest build of the ruby package
published,
http://slackware.com/security/viewer.php?l=slackware-security&y=2012&m=slackware-security.422575
,
includes the standard documentation again. It does _not_ include the C API
html documentation, which was the largest amount of the disk space.
So now, `ri` will show for standard library items as well.

Take care,
vb
http://hashbangbash.com/


On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Timothy Madden <[email protected]>wrote:

> On 10/11/2012 04:50 AM, Vincent Batts wrote:
>
>> This is true. I just put a simple build up
>> http://slackware.com/~vbatts/**ruby/ <http://slackware.com/~vbatts/ruby/>that just builds an addendum package
>> called 'ruby-doc'
>> I lobbied for this SlackBuild to be in /extra/, but we can't all get
>> what we want ;-)
>>
>
> This is just so sad ... ! :(
>
> As I said, it seems unfair to me some languages have a proper package,
> others have only a trimmed package without documentation.
>
> Thank you for the build and for your responses,
> Timothy Madden
>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> slackware mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/**mailman/listinfo/slackware<https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/slackware>
>

_______________________________________________
slackware mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/slackware