Re: FC4 crashes repeatedly on Supermicro AS1020A-T dual-core Opterons, SMP

Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.smp
Organization TMR Associates Inc, Schenectady NY
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Michal Szymanski wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>I have recently purchased three Supermicro AS1020A-T servers equipped
>with two dual-core Opterons 280 each. H8DAR-T motherboards, 8 or 12 GB
>RAM. The systems carry FC4 x86_64 with proprietary driver (made by
>Adaptec) for the onboard Marvell 88SX6041 SATA Controller. Original
>(install) kernel 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4smp - unfortunately not upgradable due
>to the lack of the SATA driver for other kernel versions.
>
>All systems crash (either hang with some "machine check exception"
>kernel messages or reset) when loaded with repeating runs of 1.3gb, CPU
>intensive with some I/O. I run 2 or 4 jobs simultaneously and they had
>never survived more than a few hours.
>
>Suspecting it may be the SATA driver problem I mounted /tmp as "tmpfs"
>and repeated the tests entirely in /tmp (with plenty of RAM this means
>(IMHO) doing I/O in memory). No success.
>
>It is somewhat better when I run similar size no-I/O jobs but these also
>crash, although less frequently.
>
>I tried to install i386 version, also crashes. Same (or even worse) with
>FC3.
>
>Memtest does not show any RAM errors. 
>
>Finally I did two tests which seem to have excluded SATA
>controller/driver as the reason for crashes:
>
>1. I installed an additional IDE hard disk and put FC4/x86_64 system on
>it (without the Adaptec driver, so the system does not even see the SATA
>disks), updated the kernel to the latest (2.6.16) - also crashed.
>
>2. I ran non-SMP 2.6.11 kernel (with Adaptec driver) on another machine.
>There have been two test repeating 1.3g jobs running on it (each getting 50%
>of the single CPU used by the system) for over 50 hours now, no crashes.
>Also, a single test job running on SMP kernel gave no crashes in 24 hours.
>
>It seems there is a problem with SMP kernel and dual-core Opterons, at
>least on this hardware. I am stuck with three top-level machines which
>can work only at 25% of nominal cpu power. Any hints would be
>appreciated.
>
>  
>
What happens if you use only one CPU? Either with a uni kernel (you 
should have gotten one) or "maxcpus=1" in the boot commands. You are 
running a custom kernel with custom drivers, so you really should be 
asking the supplier, all we can do is suggest things which might provide 
extra information.

-- 
bill davidsen <[email protected]>
  CTO TMR Associates, Inc
  Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-smp" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.