Re: smp and irq conflict

Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.smp,gmane.linux.kernel
Organization TMR Associates Inc, Schenectady NY
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Benny Amorsen wrote:
>>>>>> "BD" == Bill Davidsen <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>>>             
>
> BD> You may be able to move one board to another slot, but looking at
> BD> the bandwidth I suspect you may need a server motherboard with
> BD> multiple busses, preferably running at 66MHz 64bit. I don't think
> BD> this is a interrupt problem, but you can just try capture on two
> BD> channels which share an interrupt, like bttv0 and bttv7 to verify
> BD> that.
>
> 66MHz 64bit isn't much fun when the capture cards are 33MHz 32bit.
>
>   

It doesn't help the video to bus, but multiple busses to give a bus per 
card would help, and assuming the data are being saved to disk using a 
decent disk controller which can use the additional bandwidth, at least 
some conflict is avoided or reduced.

This is really a case of using general hardware to the utmost, I suspect 
more m/b bandwidth will be needed somewhere.

-- 
bill davidsen <[email protected]>
  CTO TMR Associates, Inc
  Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-smp" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.