Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] ASoC: dt-bindings: qcom,qaif-cpu: Add binding

> >> Srini, could you please confirm if adding QAIF DAIs to
> >> qcom,q6dsp-lpass-ports.h is acceptable given that it increases
> >> LPASS_MAX_PORT by 56 (from 149 to 205), which indirectly grows
> >> multiple arrays sized by AFE_PORT_MAX and APM_PORT_MAX in other
> >
> > BTW, the dai ids are already added by Prasad
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,q6dsp-lpass-ports.h?h=next-20260827#n240
> >
> >
> > You should use them.
>
> Correction, he only added QAIF clk ids, not the dai ids, Not sure why
> dai ids are missing.
>
> That also raises question on how did Prasad test it without the QAIF dai
> ids.
These IDs appear to have been introduced for QAIF interface clock
support in PRM SPF for DSP solution. Starting with HAWI, QAIF has been
in use.
>
>
> --srini
> >
> > to your question about increase in size, yes, this is know issue, i have
> > some changes to send which will remove the need of this static array
> > which should fix the concerns.
> >
> > But for now all the hardware dai ids for qualcomm SoCs should be in a
> > single place irrespective of dsp or non dsp solution.
> >
Understood. I will add QAIF DAI IDs in qcom,q6dsp-lpass-ports.h in the
next version.
-Harendra