Re: Antwort: Re: [suse-domino] Antwort: Re: [suse-domino] certified plattforms for domino 6.5.1
"Bruno-Alexander Leonhardt" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.suse.domino |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OF4EC23851.32AC0987-ONC1256E37.00386034-C1256E37.003A1B8C@analytek.de> |
hi, okay okay ... of course - it's impossible to support ALL linux distros .. but at least the common and most used distros should be supported - not the OS itself - but running domino on it ... and of course the users should notice ( if present ) the prerequisites ( path of jdk , etc. ) of running domino ... prerequisite shouldn't be only one ( or two ) distribution(s) ... that's all from me to this debate ... -bruno [email protected] schrieb am 11.02.2004 09:59:52: > > Serach Linux Distributionen: .....Core Linux, Debian GNU/Linux, Knoppix, > Gentoo Linux, Mandrake, RedHat, Slackware, SuSe, EasyLinux,........Icepack > Linux, .........Yggdrasil Linux > > Distributions matched: 246 > > Bruno, if IBM would start to support Debian you will ask "Why do they not > support icepack linux?"(http://www.icepack-linux.com/) > > Do you think the workaround will work on icepack? No idea!!! But IBM could > support it. Yeah. Wake up, IBM could waste much money for supporting any > distribution ever seen. > > IBM is a business oriented company. They need business partner which guarantee > the support of the linux distribution continued. They need a roadmap, business > plan and a precise role allocation. > > What do you think will happen when only ONE debian user has problems with this > work around? > > Think more business oriented. > > Thomas > > > > Am 11.02.2004 08:21:18 schrieb "Bruno-Alexander Leonhardt": > > imho, IBM should list ALL prerequisites before installing lotus domino, in this > > case they'd have to test it only once. But it's very bad if IBM will say NO: > > ONLY RED HAT OR UNITEDLINUX IS SUPPORTED ... If you've followed the whole > > debate, you'll finde a little workaround to become Domino running on Debian as > > well - now why shouldn't IBM support this Domino if there are issues / bugs / > > etc. ? Of course, no question about supporting the system itself - I'm talking > > about Domino ( and only Domino ) > > ... running onto the system(s) ... > >