Re: I Found! (Was: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [oS-en] I do not receive my own mails sent to the list.)

"Carlos E. R." <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.suse.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2026-06-07 13:48, Masaru Nomiya wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> In the Message;
> 
>    Subject    : Re: I Found! (Was: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [oS-en] I do not receive my own mails sent to the list.)
>    Message-ID : <[email protected]>
>    Date & Time: Sun, 7 Jun 2026 13:10:37 +0200
> 
> [CER] == "Carlos E. R." <[email protected]> has written:
> 
> CER>  [1  <multipart/mixed (7bit)>]
> CER>  [1.1  <text/plain; UTF-8 (base64)>]
> CER>  On 2026-06-07 01:21, Masaru Nomiya wrote:
> 
> [...]
> MN> > You changed your sender IP address to a GMX server IP to avoid being
> MN> > blacklisted. But here's what you really need to look at;
> 
> CER>  I changed the server. However, my IP is the same.
> [...]
> CER>  The important difference is that GMX hides the client IP, my
> CER> IP. Telefónica does not. Thus when Telefónica gets those two emails
> CER> back from the list server, in the case I sent that email via
> CER> Telefónica they see my router address and say it is bad, and thus
> CER> spam.
> 
> Good Point!
> 
> When you send an email via GMX's servers, your router's IP address is
> not recorded as the sender's address. Instead, the IP address of the
> GMX server is recorded as the sender. Therefore, even if your router's
> IP address is on a blacklist, it will not affect you.
> 
> On the other hand, if you send an email directly from a Telefonica
> connection, your router's IP address is recorded as the sender, so the
> reputation of that IP address directly affects whether the email is
> flagged as spam.

Exactly.

> 
> In short, the key difference lies in "who the sender's IP address
>   belongs to".  By hiding your IP address and using its own highly
>   reputable IP address instead, GMX's servers make it easier to avoid
>   being flagged as spam.
> 
> In other words, GMX operates its servers in a way that acts as a kind
> of proxy server, and this difference in operational policy is what
> makes the difference. I have to say, GMX really knows what they're
> doing. v(^o^)

Yes.


-- 
Cheers / Saludos,

		Carlos E. R.
		(from 15.6 x86_64 at Telcontar)
OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 203 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

wmMEABEIACMWIQQZEb51mJKK1KpcU/W1MxgcbY1H1QUCaiWqUAUDAAAAAAAKCRC1MxgcbY1H1a5P
AJsEp/Rnsni2ShiGwMuYwCj0AXqKoQCbB6t20ZAPKYxCQ81s/OlVNkDJNRI=
=8acZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.