Re: Tumbleweed vs 16.0
OldTime85--- via openSUSE Users <[email protected]> Wed, 24 Jun 2026 19:22:24 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.suse.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ipp5mC6_50eeRsSTg9NC4DVX2aAP3eLLUfraItP4I73Uebk08M1ZZaUgy1AYecgvn_AjPR4phd9kpIIctKlgnL6Y80UOacNZAqZzfP6XSCA=@proton.me> |
Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/mail/home) secure email. been using Tumbleweed on production machines for many years with no more problems than reported by Leap users. :) - On Wednesday, June 24th, 2026 at 12:07 PM, Jon Cosby via openSUSE Users <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday, June 24th, 2026 at 7:58 AM, GMX via openSUSE Users <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Tumbleweed (Tw) represents an almost stable rolling release with bleeding-edge updates, whereas Leap offers a fully stable release based on SUSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES). Both distributions excel in their respective approaches. >> >> You must choose the model that best suits your needs—whether you prefer frequent updates (rolling) or stability (stable). So far, I have not observed any significant differences in memory consumption or performance between them. >> >> Tumbleweed does include YAST by default. >> Best regards, >> Niclaas > > Reading comments on the forum, some people are going /months/ between updates on TW. They say their systems remain stable and they still have the latest versions of software. I wouldn't recommend this, but the stress of daily updates on TW might be overblown. > > Jon Cosby > seattlebluesblog.com