Re: Tumbleweed vs 16.0

On 2026-06-24 13:47, Carl Spitzer wrote:
> What if any preference exists?
> TW still has 32bit and now 64 bit versions.
> 
> Is TW 64 better than 16.0 for installation?
> 
> Which is leaner on memory?
> 
> Is YAST still living in TW where 16.0 has gone off in new strange
> direction for installers??
> 
> CWSIV

A late replay.

I've been using all SuSE versions, TW, LEAP, SLES
I still user TW  for my ARM (RPI), an old i686 machine, and for try-out 
machine .
I moved back from TW towards LEAP-15.6 for my local servers: Firewall, 
DNS, VPN, LAMP.
Reason:  every week doing a 1600++ package upgrade became too much of a 
burden, and for those servers I didnt need the latest state of the art
For those is leap good & efficient enough.

Greetings, Hans