Re: [oS-EN] Laptop fails to recover from hibernation, hard locks on black display
"Carlos E. R. via openSUSE Users" <[email protected]> Sun, 2 Aug 2026 23:06:20 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.suse.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-08-02 22:44, Knurpht wrote:
> Op zondag 2 augustus 2026 22:33:21 Midden-Europese zomertijd schreef Car=
los E.
> R. via openSUSE Users:
>> I did exactly what the instructions told me. I did not turn off the
>> power.
> Then you updated your BIOS, isn't that awesome? Was it hard?
No, the BIOS failed to update and the tool generated a report that it=20
said was going to be sent to the manufacturer. Did you not read it?
>> Where the fuck do you get that idea from?
> It was a friendly warning to not even do that when only some keyboard li=
ghts
> are flashing, or nothing seems to happen. People actually do decide to p=
ower
> off, because they think it takes too long. In my world it is considered =
"bloody
> rude" to show your appreciation for getting help this way. Where the fuc=
k did
> you get to that attitude?
>
What attitude? What are you talking about?
I read the man page and the opensuse wiki about that thing. I used the=20
CLI to apply updates. It said if I wanted it to reboot the machine. I=20
said "no", and then I clicked on the XFCE menu to reboot. Some messages=20
went by during boot about no capsules, I had no time to read or take a=20
photo of it. Then the machine went through the normal boot to operating=20
system. Then I asked the command about updates, and it said that some=20
things were updated and some were not, and produced a report, which I=20
pasted here.
I am not happy about a procedure that fails to update the firmware for=20
whatever reason that I do not understand.
I know very well to wait and not power off during firmware updates.
If it does hang during the procedure, well, you are really fucked,=20
machine lost. Which is why I do not happily apply them.
=2D-=20
Cheers / Saludos,
=20
Carlos E. R.
(from openSUSE 16.0 (Laicolasse))