Re: ham radio files missing
"Dick" <[email protected]> Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:30:59 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.suse.ham |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <003201c54423$404205e0$1a06a02c@Richard> |
I tried the url below [ ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/ham/9.3-i386] and couldn't get in so lopped off the last bit and go in .. then clicked on the folder and found nothing inside ??? 73, Dick ZS6RO ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Hartzell" <[email protected]> To: "Joerg Reuter" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 4:03 PM Subject: Re: [suse-ham-e] ham radio files missing > On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 08:42, Joerg Reuter wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 01:07:03PM -0400, Jim Hartzell wrote: > > > > > I was just looking at the package list for SUSE 9.3 PRO on Novell's web > > > site. I cannot find the "Ham radio" packages > > > > As Thomas wrote, you can find them on > > > > ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/ham/9.3-i386 > > > > or on any SUSE LINUX mirror that carries the projects folder. You can > > simply add the directory as a YaST installation source ("yast > > inst_source") to be able to install them via YaST. > > > > Please note that I maintain these package in my spare time and that I > > currently cannot test them as I don't find the time... Thus, the > > packages are not official SUSE LINUX packages. > > > > The reason for not delivering hamradio packages on the media kit is that > > most of the programs are quite old. It becomes more and more difficult > > to even be able to build them. Additionally, many of them won't build on > > any other system architecture than PC (i386), causing additional load on > > me and our autobuild team. And finally, the potential costs to react > > fast and correctly in case of security issues with these packages are > > too high to justify further support for the packages. > > > > Maintaining the packages privately has at least one advantage for me: I > > have to fix and build the packages only once within the last weeks of > > the beta phase of the product, opposed to (in some cases) weekly after > > someone has checked in a new gcc, glibc, QT or KDE update. > > > > 73, > Joerg, > Thanks for the info. Many thanks for building the packages, I understand > they are not official. I don't use them all but they are nice to have > and as you say they are old (still work, AX.25 protocol hasn't changed > in awhile). Some programs have newer versions out there but SUSE RPMs > for them are hard to find, XASTIR is one. I am still fairly new at Linux > and someday hope to learn how to build RPMs from the tarballs. > > Jim > WA3UQD > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >