Re: Adding liquidshell to KDE:Extra

Am 08.06.19 um 21:30 schrieb Luca Beltrame:
> In data sabato 8 giugno 2019 17:56:53 CEST, Martin Koller ha scritto:
> 
>> ok, then please suggest a wording which makes clear that one can use
>> liquidshell instead of plasmashell, please.
> 
> "A Qt5 based desktop shell"?
> Hmm, why is it important that it is Qt5 based? Why not saying what is
(supposed to be) cool about it:

"A simple yet powerful desktop shell that comes with limited hardware
requirements - the raising star of tomorrows desktops"... or so. (The
last part is optional ;-)

I might not be deep enough in here, but why is the topic so frosty?
Wasn't this all about choice, and collaboration also on alternatives? I
love to read technical discussions why Muh is better than Meh but there
was some different tune here.

Klaas
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]